Formulating a neutral response
\n
I want to provide a neutral explanation regarding media rumors, emphasizing skepticism and the importance of waiting for official announcements. Offering to pull sources sounds good, but I should respond in concise Chinese without heavy formatting. I might consider using one-liners or bullet points. I'll ask what the user needs help with, such as verifying sources or outlining the context. I should avoid mentioning the current coach and focus on typical patterns and signals to watch for in sports announcements.
大意懂了：北青辟谣称“北京国安没跟徐正源接触”，把外界传闻归因于经纪团队常见的炒作手法，用来抬声量/谈判筹码。
需要我做哪种帮助？
- 核实原报道与时间来源，给出链接与要点
- 简要科普：徐正源的履历、与中超渊源、经纪团队常用操作
- 分析这类传闻对市场与球队（续约/选帅/更衣室）的实际影响
- 关注点清单：哪些信号出现才意味着真的在谈（例如可靠记者线、俱乐部官宣等）
\n
\n
\n
你希望哪一项，或直接发我想核实的具体链接/截图也行。
